07-25-2008, 11:16 AM
|
#51
|
|
54 " SOMBRERO!!!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 4,132
|
I agree, demon...... that is a Maggie!
Magnacharger is awesome! 
__________________
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links :: Login or Register to hide these ads. |
|
|
|
07-25-2008, 11:26 AM
|
#52
|
|
54 " SOMBRERO!!!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 4,132
|
Here's the G8 with a Magna Charger.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-25-2008, 01:02 PM
|
#53
|
|
*************************
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 1,249
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonz5GEN
Here's the G8 with a Magna Charger.
|
I wonder if GM will ever offer a Coupe version of the G8, 2 doors would look slick on it |
|
|
|
|
07-25-2008, 03:24 PM
|
#54
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonz5GEN
Here's the G8 with a Magna Charger.
|
Loved the part when it was bustin the cobra's A$$.  GOOD BY! |
|
|
|
|
08-04-2008, 11:26 PM
|
#55
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: TN
Posts: 2,295
|
With all the quipes and complaints most of you are missing the most important thing about those numbers.
13.4 @ 108 Means that car was spinning badly. I want to see the whole timeslip I'd bet money tht the 60' is in the 2.3 range. A 108 trap speed means the car "can" hit a 12 stock if you can hook it. Weight or not if it can hit 108 MPH in the 1/4, a good drive can get it into the 12's easy. Slicks for sure is a definate 12 second time slip. Considering an optimum run and launch 104 MPH is good for 13 flat. 108 is well into the 12's with 2.0 60' or less.
__________________
 2000 Red 1SC Z28 A4 - dead for now
2005 Black GTO M6 6.0 - daily driver
|
|
|
|
|
08-05-2008, 12:19 AM
|
#56
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 48
|
im just glad that its not slower than my nearly stock 2000 SS, i run a 13.5 flat every time, and i would be embarrassed if the 2010 was slower, so i am happy about that.....
|
|
|
|
|
08-05-2008, 05:04 AM
|
#57
|
|
54 " SOMBRERO!!!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 4,132
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by slims00ls1z28
With all the quipes and complaints most of you are missing the most important thing about those numbers.
13.4 @ 108 Means that car was spinning badly. I want to see the whole timeslip I'd bet money tht the 60' is in the 2.3 range. A 108 trap speed means the car "can" hit a 12 stock if you can hook it. Weight or not if it can hit 108 MPH in the 1/4, a good drive can get it into the 12's easy. Slicks for sure is a definate 12 second time slip. Considering an optimum run and launch 104 MPH is good for 13 flat. 108 is well into the 12's with 2.0 60' or less.
|
Slim, you are right on the money. I'm very optimistic that the SS will reward me with a fistful of 12 second timeslips, right off the dealer floor! Hmmmmm.........brand new Camaro released in about March '09 + cool Englishtown air = !!!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
08-25-2008, 11:36 PM
|
#58
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 401
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jinx
3725 lbs
|
man i thought it weighed 4000
u sure its only 3700? |
|
|
|
|
08-26-2008, 05:06 PM
|
#59
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 318
|
This is why I canceled my Challenger order, bought a Bike, and am now sitting it out..  !
__________________
We the people of 5thGen.org, in order to form a more perfect Camaro, establish horsepower, ensure domestic dominance, promote The General's welfare, and secure the blessings of quality to ourselves and fellow drivers, do ordain and establish this constitution of the united enthusiasts of Camaro.
|
|
|
|
|
09-06-2008, 11:21 PM
|
#60
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Morehead, KY
Posts: 20
|
If the car is trapping 108 (which seems a little low) it should be capable of a low 12 with drag radials. Something in the 12.1-12.4 range. The car will eventually run 11's with bolt-ons...FACT. My TBSS ran 14.8 in august heat, after bolt-ons it ran 12.8...it picked up 2 seconds and 10 mph...now some of that was the weather, but alot of it was the mods. You should see the ET drop by at least a second, from stock to full bolt-on. Add a cam, heads or spray and all bets are off. Just like the 4th gen, removing some weight shouldn't be too bad either...You should be able to take 100-150 out pretty easily without hacking up the car. Interestingly the vette (C/D) ran 12.4 @116 at a weight of 3300 lbs in mid 60's weather. I think the predictions for the camaro are probably fairly accurate, b/c the camaro weighs 600-800 lbs more, and this would equate fairly accurately to the difference in trap speed. Unless you can get the weight off, its just not gonna be any where near as quick as a vette mod-for-mod.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
