2010 2SS M6 with 81 miles Results - ModernCamaro.com - 5th Generation Camaro Enthusiasts
Dyno Results & Bench Racing Dyno your 5th Gen? Post the numbers here! How fast will it go?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 11 Old 08-25-2009, 07:59 AM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
BAD LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Slinger, WI
Posts: 83
 
2010 2SS M6 with 81 miles Results

After just picking the car up about 5 hours before i brought the car out to the dyno that i do LSX tuning at on the side and wanted to see what the LS3could belt out before i dug into it...

Rock stock with 81 miles, it laid down 390 and 382 with coolant temps getting up to 215 and 105 degree IAT's. The second pull it made 391 and 378 This was ona Mustang dyno BTW.

Timing was at a steady, but pultry 18 degrees for both runs and the AFR never got out the mid 11s! LOL

Thing sure lays down #s like the wednesday car it is! Seems pretty high to me but also seems to be NOT far off from what others are seeing from time to time.




2010 Camaro RS/SS - BAD LS3
2008 TrailBlazer SS AWD- LSX TUNR
2000 Camaro Z28 - HER LS1

Last edited by BAD LS1; 08-25-2009 at 08:04 AM.
BAD LS1 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 11 Old 08-31-2009, 06:26 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 180
 
timing seems so low for a NA car.. def more power in there..

On Order 2010 Camaro SS RS Cyber Grey w/ Balck Stripes
2004 Dodge SRT-4 (455wHP 450wTQ)
GQ4Life is offline  
post #3 of 11 Old 08-31-2009, 09:35 AM
Veteran Member
 
urbanlegend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virgina Beach
Posts: 1,039
 
Wow. Talk about getting a baseline dyno. No hesitation at all. Isn't the Mustang Dyno the heartbreaker? They almost always register lower than any other dyno?

Still a wannabe.
urbanlegend is offline  
 
post #4 of 11 Old 08-31-2009, 01:26 PM
Veteran Member
 
el ess X's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 3,055
  
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlegend View Post
Wow. Talk about getting a baseline dyno. No hesitation at all. Isn't the Mustang Dyno the heartbreaker? They almost always register lower than any other dyno?
I thought it was because they usually measured higher than actual.

2010 2SS/RS Auto, Sunroof, Engine Cover. Transformer Edition package.
2013 ZL1 ragtop #5478. 1 of 54 CRT M6 'verts.
el ess X is offline  
post #5 of 11 Old 08-31-2009, 03:22 PM
Veteran Member
 
urbanlegend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virgina Beach
Posts: 1,039
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by el ess X View Post
I thought it was because they usually measured higher than actual.
Amongst the Z owners, they aren't liked. Our dyno always come out on the low side on a Mustang.


And nobody knock the Z. I can't afford a Camaro right now.

Still a wannabe.
urbanlegend is offline  
post #6 of 11 Old 10-21-2009, 12:54 PM
Junior Member
 
Addicts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
Posts: 12
 
Most mustang dyno's run a bit lower than others. I like it because it's more of a real world number. It's not glorified, it's a legitimate number.

It's funny when you see someone with Mustang Dyno numbers and someone with another dynos' numbers, the other dyno reading higher, but the car that ran on the mustang dyno is faster.
Addicts is offline  
post #7 of 11 Old 02-27-2010, 10:30 PM
Junior Member
 
stockman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: dallas
Posts: 39
 
dyno off

sounds like there dyno is off a bit to say the least .,!

The only real conversation you can have is with yourself!
stockman is offline  
post #8 of 11 Old 02-28-2010, 07:23 AM
Veteran Member
 
POWERFREAK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 7,873
  
Quote:
Originally Posted by stockman View Post
sounds like there dyno is off a bit to say the least .,!
Yeah, mine did 359hp on a mustang dyno. Just goes to prove that all dynos are different. The most important # is the amount of improvement when mods are done.

2010-2SS/RS/LS3/IBM/RP6: ECS-Paxton Supercharger / American Racing Headers & Exhaust / PFADT Suspension / DSS 9" 4.10 Rear / FOR SALE!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taglane View Post
Powerfreak is the only one who actually understood anything.
POWERFREAK is offline  
post #9 of 11 Old 02-28-2010, 11:18 AM
Veteran Member
 
el ess X's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 3,055
  
My thinking was a bit backwards. Mustangs don't really read lower, they seem to be more realistic (in dyno worlds) and I believe it was the Dynojets that were a bit looser with the numbers.

With that said, calibrations have EVERYTHING to do with how well a dyno does, along with operating conditions. They'll differ from run to run and day to day and between dynos of the same make. I'll go along with Powerfreak though in that no matter what dyno you use, use the same one every time for checking mods to get a realistic delta on the numbers.

2010 2SS/RS Auto, Sunroof, Engine Cover. Transformer Edition package.
2013 ZL1 ragtop #5478. 1 of 54 CRT M6 'verts.
el ess X is offline  
post #10 of 11 Old 02-28-2010, 09:36 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 31
 
357 on a dynojet
oldchevyguy is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the ModernCamaro.com - 5th Generation Camaro Enthusiasts forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome