Let's compare Mustang & Camaro stock dyno charts! - ModernCamaro.com - 5th Generation Camaro Enthusiasts
Dyno Results & Bench Racing Dyno your 5th Gen? Post the numbers here! How fast will it go?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 17 Old 08-05-2010, 12:50 AM Thread Starter
ModernCamaro.com Founder / Former Camaro Disciple
 
OctaneZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 11,842
           
Thumbs up Let's compare Mustang & Camaro stock dyno charts!

Something that's always interesting to look at is stock dyno charts....

Here are two separate dyno charts comparing a stock 2011 Mustang GT and a stock 2010 Camaro SS.
In each case, both cars are as stock as they rolled off the factory line, both are 6-speed manuals, and both are using 93 octane gas.

Dyno runs by IPS on the same day:
Red lines are Camaro, Blue lines are Mustang.


Dyno runs by LG Motorsports (same dyno, but different days)
Green lines are Camaro, Red lines are Mustang


While the peak numbers are similar, as you can see the power bands are quite different.

As you can plainly see by the dyno charts, Camaro definitely has the power advantage where it counts!

2001 Camaro Z28 H/C/I LH6 A4 3.42

Like ModernCamaro.com on Facebook!
OctaneZ28 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 17 Old 08-05-2010, 06:45 AM
Veteran Member
 
RedJewel2SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 4,449
 
check out that low end torque that launches you off the line

April 2010 Member/Car of the Month

Gone but not Forgotten!
RedJewel2SS is offline  
post #3 of 17 Old 08-05-2010, 11:38 AM
Veteran Member
 
demonspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 4,544
 
What it doesn't take into consideration is gearing and weight. The Mustang has optional 3.73's (standard are 3.55 IIRC) vs. Camaro 3.45. Right there will help with the torque deficit. I don't even need to elaborate on weight as the Camaro is the porker of the two.

It's not all about dyno numbers

www.fquick.com/demonspeed
Present: '02 SS #7146
Past: '89 IROC-Z|'91 Z28|'00 SS #0795|'01 Z28
demonspeed is offline  
 
post #4 of 17 Old 08-05-2010, 11:55 AM
Veteran Member
 
POWERFREAK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 7,873
  
Quote:
Originally Posted by demonspeed View Post
What it doesn't take into consideration is gearing and weight. The Mustang has optional 3.73's (standard are 3.55 IIRC) vs. Camaro 3.45. Right there will help with the torque deficit. I don't even need to elaborate on weight as the Camaro is the porker of the two.

It's not all about dyno numbers
yeah...it's about which one looks better...and we all know which one that is.

2010-2SS/RS/LS3/IBM/RP6: ECS-Paxton Supercharger / American Racing Headers & Exhaust / PFADT Suspension / DSS 9" 4.10 Rear / FOR SALE!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taglane View Post
Powerfreak is the only one who actually understood anything.
POWERFREAK is offline  
post #5 of 17 Old 08-05-2010, 01:12 PM
Veteran Member
 
demonspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 4,544
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by POWERFREAK View Post
yeah...it's about which one looks better...and we all know which one that is.

www.fquick.com/demonspeed
Present: '02 SS #7146
Past: '89 IROC-Z|'91 Z28|'00 SS #0795|'01 Z28
demonspeed is offline  
post #6 of 17 Old 08-05-2010, 03:33 PM
Premium Member
 
patriotpa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,215
  
Garage
SO? Slap in a set of 4.11s

James 1:25 Ordered from Faulkner Chevy #NKCF02 1100 5/8/9 2000, 3300 7/16/9 TPW 7/20,GOT MY (low) VIN! 4000 7/24/9 ,Picked up 8/7/9!!! Signed Litho #45. Car signed by FBodfather 2011. Service: Jennings Chevy in PA. We don't "drift", kiddies... we POWER SLIDE! MOTM/COTM Sept 2012 Pro Patria Vigilans.
Click the pic.. I don't tolerate fools.
patriotpa is offline  
post #7 of 17 Old 08-06-2010, 12:24 AM Thread Starter
ModernCamaro.com Founder / Former Camaro Disciple
 
OctaneZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 11,842
           
The only reasons Mustang is lighter is because the brakes are smaller, the wheels are smaller, and it has less equipment.
Bring those items up to par with Camaro's equipment and the weight difference would be negligible.

So... on the weight issue...
Take a base V8 Mustang and a base V8 Camaro...
  • Remove the Mustang's seats and put in the Camaro's seats - front and rear.
  • Take off the Mustang's brakes and put on the Camaro's brakes.
  • Take off the Mustang's wheels and tires and put on the Camaro's wheels and tires.
  • Remove the Mustang's live axle rear end and replace it with the Camaro's 4.5-link IRS.
  • Take out the Camaro's 2 curtain airbags and their associated sensors and electronics, and put them in the Mustang.
Now weigh the Mustang.
What you'll have is a vehicle that is only about 50lbs lighter than the base V8 Camaro, and still has a chassis that's not as rigid.
Add some steel reinforcements (aka more weight) to fix that.

(If I could afford to actually do this, I would!
....anyone got Uncle Donald's phone number? )

Why are Camaro's seats heavier? They're larger, thicker, and more comfortable.
Why are Camaro's brakes heavier? They're bigger.
Why are Camaro's wheels and tires heavier? They're larger in diameter and wider.
IRS is known to weigh considerably more than a live axle.
In 2003, the difference in weight between a Mustang's live axle and a Cobra's IRS was 80lbs, and that was a 4-link.
I would bet Camaro's 4.5-link IRS weighs 100lbs more than a Mustang's live axle.
Adding the 2 curtain air bags will of course add their weight.

Obviously none of the Camaro's parts would actually bolt up on the Mustang, but you get the idea.

2001 Camaro Z28 H/C/I LH6 A4 3.42

Like ModernCamaro.com on Facebook!
OctaneZ28 is offline  
post #8 of 17 Old 08-06-2010, 07:24 AM
Veteran Member
 
demonspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 4,544
 
On the street/track/bench, it doesn't matter "change this -- modify that." The fact of the matter is, the 5.0, while marginally underpowered compared to the 6.2, is still lighter and better geared from the factory. When people say "well, do this to the Camaro and..." Ok, then do the same to the Mustang. I remember these same conversations in 2002 with the introduction of the "Terminator."

I am a Camaro fan like everyone else on this site, I would even go as far to say moreso than many as I did not just jump on the Camaro bandwagon with the introduction of the 5th gen, but lets not be blinded by our loyalty. Knowing your competition is just as important as the pride in your own car.

www.fquick.com/demonspeed
Present: '02 SS #7146
Past: '89 IROC-Z|'91 Z28|'00 SS #0795|'01 Z28

Last edited by demonspeed; 08-06-2010 at 07:27 AM.
demonspeed is offline  
post #9 of 17 Old 08-06-2010, 07:50 AM
Veteran Member
 
POWERFREAK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 7,873
  
Knowing how much of a difference 4.10's made in my car, if GM offered at least a 3.73 option, I think that would go a long way in helping the car NOT feel heavy to most people.

I'm not blinded by my loyalty...I thought it was a great car in stock form, but my eyes opened BIGTIME...the car is soooooo much better with all the mods I've done...it no longer feels like a heavy car and gone is that "drive by wire" feel.

2010-2SS/RS/LS3/IBM/RP6: ECS-Paxton Supercharger / American Racing Headers & Exhaust / PFADT Suspension / DSS 9" 4.10 Rear / FOR SALE!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taglane View Post
Powerfreak is the only one who actually understood anything.

Last edited by POWERFREAK; 08-06-2010 at 07:55 AM.
POWERFREAK is offline  
post #10 of 17 Old 08-06-2010, 07:57 AM
Veteran Member
 
RedJewel2SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 4,449
 
all i care about is that MY car is faster than ANY mustang i race

April 2010 Member/Car of the Month

Gone but not Forgotten!
RedJewel2SS is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the ModernCamaro.com - 5th Generation Camaro Enthusiasts forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome