Quadriplegic's suit against GM alleges Camaro defectively designed - ModernCamaro.com - 5th Generation Camaro Enthusiasts
The MC Lounge General Discussions. Disrespectful behavior will not be tolerated.
POLITICAL AND/OR RELIGIOUS CONTENT IS PROHIBITED

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 46 Old 11-06-2008, 12:17 PM Thread Starter
Supporting Super Moderator
 
brandonppr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 5,668
 
Quadriplegic's suit against GM alleges Camaro defectively designed

The car is a T Top car. IMO you take that risk just like when you decide to drive a vert. IMO it don't mean that the car should not be able to be made though. He didn't have to drive a T TOP Camaro.


http://www.setexasrecord.com/news/21...ively-designed


Quadriplegic's suit against GM alleges Camaro defectively designed


11/6/2008 11:00 AM
By Michelle Massey, Texarkana Bureau



MARSHALL -- When driving his 1995 Camaro, Christopher Reddick's vehicle left the highway and overturned after he lost control. Reddick was severely injured and rendered a quadriplegic.

Alleging the car is dangerous and defective, Reddick believes General Motors is responsible for his injuries in failing to recall or change the body design of the T-top model Cameros.

Christopher Reddick and his parents, Terri Eubanks and David Reddick filed the motor vehicle product liability suit against General Motors Corporation on Nov. 4 in the Marshall Division of the Eastern District of Texas.

The complaint argues the 1995 Chevrolet Camaro is not reasonably crashworthy due to a lack of body structural integrity.

The complaint sates, "General Motors Corporation failed to adequately reinforce the vehicle to minimize body instability, including torquing, bending, twisting and intrusions into the driver's compartment."

Due to the alleged defects, the plaintiff claims that during the accident when the vehicle overturned, the roof pillars collapsed. Reddick believes General Motors could have incorporated a permanent rail to strengthen the structural members to prevent roof collapse.

The plaintiff states that the acts of failing to improve the Camaro are of a "gross and flagrant character in reckless disregard of the safety and welfare of consumers…"

Further the complaint asserts that the vehicle was defective and unreasonably dangerous because the "the interior components and padding within the vehicle were defectively designed and inadequate to provide a reasonably safe occupant system" and "the vehicle failed to provide reasonable head and spine protection to the driver of the vehicle."

Causes of action asserted against the defendant include strict liability, negligence, gross negligence, and breach of warranty.

Reddick is seeking special, incidental, and consequential damages for medical care and treatment costs, pharmaceutical expenses, wage, benefits and economic loss, and travel costs. The complaint is seeking general damages for past and future pain and suffering, permanent physical injury, mental anxiety, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life.

Terri Eubanks and David Reddick are seeking damages for emotional pain, loss of consortium, and pecuniary loss, including loss of care, maintenance, support, services, advice, and counseling.

Reddick's mother is also seeking damages to recoup monies spent on around the clock care, special transportation, and the substantial and necessary modifications she made to her home.

Longview attorneys John D. Sloan Jr., M. Raymond Hatcher, and Garrett Wilson of the Sloan, Bagley, Hatcher and Perry Law Firm are representing the plaintiffs.

U.S. District Judge T. John Ward will preside over the litigation.

1998 Camaro A4 7.06 @ 96.5 MPH NA 1.47 best 60ft
2010 Camaro Tube Chassis work in progress
brandonppr is offline  
post #2 of 46 Old 11-06-2008, 12:24 PM
Veteran Member
 
tazjetman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,345
 
wow .... this makes me mad

Quote:
Originally Posted by 54inches View Post
Facebook has sucked me into Farmtown.

What can I say I love virtual plowing.
tazjetman is offline  
post #3 of 46 Old 11-06-2008, 12:25 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,153
  
I guarantee you the family was approached by a *** ****** ambulance chaser.
Devryn is offline  
post #4 of 46 Old 11-06-2008, 12:34 PM
Supporting Super Moderator
 
LorcinLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 2,416
 
How exactly did he roll a camaro? I've never heard of anyone rolling a 4th gen unless excessive speeding was involved.


2010 Camaro RS SS LS3 (Bumble Bee) Vin#192 & 8 others made by GM and one Christine
LorcinLS1 is offline  
post #5 of 46 Old 11-06-2008, 12:36 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 5
 
Gotta wonder the situation too.... what was he doing when his vehicle "left the road after he lost control"

kind of sounds like a "watch this" moment gone bad. I dont know all the details, but theres no mention of mechanical malfunction, and i know my car doesnt just "leave the road" for no reason.

sounds like he's just trying to cash in any way he can.

Edit: ^^ Exactly
Thwick is offline  
post #6 of 46 Old 11-06-2008, 01:01 PM
Senior Member
 
dshane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 637
 
I bet he bought them **** thing because it HAD T-tops.

2006 Dodge Charger Daytona

Top Banana! 0653 of 4000
dshane is offline  
post #7 of 46 Old 11-06-2008, 01:46 PM
CJP
Veteran Member
 
CJP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,746
 
Yeah, I have a 98 with T-Tops, I know what I bought when I got it. You want a crush proof ride? Roll-cage! My 67 SS has one. I want to know exactly how he lost control. I smell bull****!

Your Car, Your Story, only on COMBUSTION CHAMBER!
https://www.youtube.com/c/combustionchamber
CJP is offline  
post #8 of 46 Old 11-06-2008, 01:52 PM
Senior Member
 
golfaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bremerton, WA
Posts: 897
 
This is the dumbest thing I've ever seen, don't get me wrong I feel bad for the guy, but all he's doing is trying to blame others for his problems. As stated above, he was likely screwing around to roll a Camaro, I mean come on its not like a top heavy SUV or something. What if he was in a convertible, what protection would he have then. Its not the car's fault, its just something that happens, sucks, and will have to be lived with.

2011 Synergy Green Metallic 1SS Camaro:
RS Package, White Ralley Stripes, Premium Sound.
Mods; Flowmaster Exhaust, Vararam CAI, Pfadt Sport Suspension, Budnik "Ice" Wheels, Nitto Invo tires
Upcoming Mods; Custom grill and badging.
golfaholic is offline  
post #9 of 46 Old 11-06-2008, 01:54 PM
CJP
Veteran Member
 
CJP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,746
 
Aren't all 4th Gen's Pre-Cut for T-Tops? I thought if you got a hardtop, but wanted T-Tops, you could have the dealership do it?

Your Car, Your Story, only on COMBUSTION CHAMBER!
https://www.youtube.com/c/combustionchamber
CJP is offline  
post #10 of 46 Old 11-06-2008, 02:13 PM
Supporter of common sense
 
OverAnxious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 9,152
  
We don't have all of the information here (as usual from the media).
It is a safe assumption GM met every Federal mandate for vehicle safety in his 1995 Camaro. Not sure how much merit the case has after that.

They may be just going after a cash settlement to avoid court? Who knows...

Joe :: Over Anxious 67 Camaro RS/SS L78
5thgenblog.com // Michigan Classics
Chevrolet Camaro in Transformers // My ebaY auctions

Hot Rod Search Google searches for gearheads!
OverAnxious is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the ModernCamaro.com - 5th Generation Camaro Enthusiasts forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome