[pojo2001]

I have heard that procharged is easier on the engine I would like to see what everyone's opinion is before I go and purchase either or.

 

[patriotpa]

A procharger is a supercharger. Same same.
Procharger is just a brand.

 

[pojo2001]

true but the 3 different types of superchargers work different at least that's what I read the procharger acts like a turbo if I am understanding right still the same concept just a different way to get the air in?

 

[patriotpa]

No. A turbo spins from exhaust gases. A supercharger is driven by the crankshaft. They all stuff air into the engine. You'll be into it for at least $7,000 to do it right.

If you must have forced induction, and want power with ZERO lag, a supercharger is the way to go.

Both add stress to the engine. It's a power adder.

The LS series can be built normally aspirated to very high power levels, and, properly done, will be more reliable than any forced induction build. No lag here either.

Don't go cheap. It could cost you your engine, at least. That's a $10,000.00 engine.

Hopefully, one of the GOOD engine builders on this forum will chime in and help you with your application.

 

[pojo2001]

If I could get about the same power out of the engine without using the supercharger I will go that route.

 

[patriotpa]

Post a callout for engine builders on this forum. There are some GOOD ones.

Post what you want. RWHP, bottom end torque, 0-60, 1/8 mile,1/4 mile, top speed, fuel economy , etc.